Accumulator Error Feedback
From Wikimization
(Difference between revisions)
(→links) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
% CSUM Sum of elements using a compensated summation algorithm. | % CSUM Sum of elements using a compensated summation algorithm. | ||
% | % | ||
- | + | % This Matlab code implements Kahan's compensated | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | % This Matlab code implements | + | |
% summation algorithm (1964) which often takes about twice as long, | % summation algorithm (1964) which often takes about twice as long, | ||
% but produces more accurate sums when the number of | % but produces more accurate sums when the number of | ||
Line 57: | Line 53: | ||
y = x(i) + e; | y = x(i) + e; | ||
s_hat = s_hat_old + y; | s_hat = s_hat_old + y; | ||
- | e = (s_hat_old | + | e = y - (s_hat - s_hat_old); %calculate parentheses first |
end | end | ||
return | return |
Revision as of 19:13, 29 January 2018

csum() in Digital Signal Processing terms: z-1 is a unit delay,
Q is a 64-bit floating-point quantizer. Algebra represents neither a sequence of instructions or algorithm. It is only meant to remind that an imperfect accumulator introduces noise into a series.
qi represents error due to quantization (additive by definition).
Q is a 64-bit floating-point quantizer. Algebra represents neither a sequence of instructions or algorithm. It is only meant to remind that an imperfect accumulator introduces noise into a series.
qi represents error due to quantization (additive by definition).
function s_hat = csum(x) % CSUM Sum of elements using a compensated summation algorithm. % % This Matlab code implements Kahan's compensated % summation algorithm (1964) which often takes about twice as long, % but produces more accurate sums when the number of % elements is large. -David Gleich % % Also see SUM. % % % Matlab csum() Example: % clear all % csumv=0; rsumv=0; % while csumv <= rsumv % v = randn(13e6,1); % rsumv = abs(sum(v) - sum(v(end:-1:1))); % disp(['rsumv = ' num2str(rsumv,'%18.16f')]); % [~, idx] = sort(abs(v),'descend'); % x = v(idx); % csumv = abs(csum(x) - csum(x(end:-1:1))); % disp(['csumv = ' num2str(csumv,'%18.16e')]); % end s_hat=0; e=0; for i=1:numel(x) s_hat_old = s_hat; y = x(i) + e; s_hat = s_hat_old + y; e = (s_hat_old - s_hat) + y; %calculate difference first (Higham) end return
sorting
Sorting is not integral above because the commented Example
(inspired by Higham) would then display false positive results.
In practice, input sorting
should begin the csum() function to achieve the most accurate summation:
function s_hat = csum(x) s_hat=0; e=0; [~, idx] = sort(abs(x),'descend'); x = x(idx); for i=1:numel(x) s_hat_old = s_hat; y = x(i) + e; s_hat = s_hat_old + y; e = y - (s_hat - s_hat_old); %calculate parentheses first end return
Even in complete absence of sorting, csum() can be more accurate than conventional summation by orders of magnitude.
links
Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms 2e, ch.4.3, Nicholas J. Higham, 2002
Further Remarks on Reducing Truncation Errors, William Kahan, 1964
For multiplier error feedback, see:
Implementation of Recursive Digital Filters for High-Fidelity Audio
Comments on Implementation of Recursive Digital Filters for High-Fidelity Audio