Euclidean distance cone faces
From Wikimization
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
For a better explanation, see section 6.5.3 in [http://meboo.convexoptimization.com/BOOK/ConeDistanceMatrices.pdf Cone of Distance Matrices]. | For a better explanation, see section 6.5.3 in [http://meboo.convexoptimization.com/BOOK/ConeDistanceMatrices.pdf Cone of Distance Matrices]. | ||
| - | Definition of ''exposure'' is in [http://meboo.convexoptimization.com/BOOK/convexgeometry.pdf Convex Geometry]. | + | Definition of ''exposure'' is in [http://meboo.convexoptimization.com/BOOK/convexgeometry.pdf Convex Geometry]. |
| + | |||
| + | Basically, the question asks whether all faces can be defined by intersection with a supporting hyperplane; that intersection is termed ''exposure.'' | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 26 June 2008
The question remains open whether all faces of the cone of Euclidean distance matrices
(whose dimension is less than dimension of the cone)
are exposed like they are for the positive semidefinite cone.
For a better explanation, see section 6.5.3 in Cone of Distance Matrices.
Definition of exposure is in Convex Geometry.
Basically, the question asks whether all faces can be defined by intersection with a supporting hyperplane; that intersection is termed exposure.