Farkas' lemma
From Wikimization
(→Geometrical Interpretation) |
(→Geometrical Interpretation) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
== Geometrical Interpretation == | == Geometrical Interpretation == | ||
Given vector <math>\,b\,</math>, then Farkas' lemma simply states that | Given vector <math>\,b\,</math>, then Farkas' lemma simply states that | ||
- | either <math>\,b</math> belongs to | + | either <math>\,b</math> belongs to convex cone <math>\mathcal{K}^*</math> |
or it does not. | or it does not. | ||
Revision as of 21:09, 10 November 2008
Farkas' lemma is a result used in the proof of the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) theorem from nonlinear programming.
It states that if is a matrix and
a vector, then exactly one of the following two systems has a solution:
-
for some
such that
or in the alternative
-
for some
where the notation means that all components of the vector
are nonnegative.
The lemma was originally proved by Farkas in 1902. The above formulation is due to Albert W. Tucker in the 1950s.
It is an example of a theorem of the alternative; a theorem stating that of two systems, one or the other has a solution, but not both.
Proof
(Dattorro) Define a convex cone
whose dual cone is
From the definition of dual cone,
rather,
Given some vector and
, then
can only mean
.
An alternative system is therefore simply
and so the stated result follows.
Geometrical Interpretation
Given vector , then Farkas' lemma simply states that
either
belongs to convex cone
or it does not.
References
- Gyula Farkas, Über die Theorie der Einfachen Ungleichungen, Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, volume 124, pages 1–27, 1902.
http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/sub/digbib/loader?ht=VIEW&did=D261364