Moreau's decomposition theorem
From Wikimization
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Sándor Zoltán Németh | ||
+ | |||
== Projection on closed convex sets == | == Projection on closed convex sets == | ||
=== Projection mapping === | === Projection mapping === | ||
- | |||
Let <math>(\mathbb H,\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle)</math> be a Hilbert space and <math>\mathcal C</math> a closed convex set in <math>\mathbb H.</math> The '''projection mapping''' <math>P_{\mathcal C}</math> onto <math>\mathcal C</math> is the mapping <math>P_{\mathcal C}:\mathbb H\to\mathbb H</math> defined by <math>P_{\mathcal C}(x)\in\mathcal C</math> and | Let <math>(\mathbb H,\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle)</math> be a Hilbert space and <math>\mathcal C</math> a closed convex set in <math>\mathbb H.</math> The '''projection mapping''' <math>P_{\mathcal C}</math> onto <math>\mathcal C</math> is the mapping <math>P_{\mathcal C}:\mathbb H\to\mathbb H</math> defined by <math>P_{\mathcal C}(x)\in\mathcal C</math> and | ||
Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
=== Characterization of the projection === | === Characterization of the projection === | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
Let <math>(\mathbb H,\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle)</math> be a Hilbert space, <math>\mathcal C</math> a closed convex set in <math>\mathbb H,\,u\in\mathbb H</math> and <math>v\in\mathcal C.</math> Then, <math>v=P_{\mathcal C}(u)</math> if and only if <math>\langle u-v,w-v\rangle\leq0</math> for all <math>w\in\mathcal C.</math> | Let <math>(\mathbb H,\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle)</math> be a Hilbert space, <math>\mathcal C</math> a closed convex set in <math>\mathbb H,\,u\in\mathbb H</math> and <math>v\in\mathcal C.</math> Then, <math>v=P_{\mathcal C}(u)</math> if and only if <math>\langle u-v,w-v\rangle\leq0</math> for all <math>w\in\mathcal C.</math> | ||
=== Proof === | === Proof === | ||
- | |||
Suppose that <math>v=P_{\mathcal C}u.</math> Let <math>w\in\mathcal C</math> and <math>t\in (0,1)</math> be arbitrary. By using the convexity of <math>\mathcal C,</math> it follows that <math>(1-t)v+tw\in\mathcal C.</math> Then, by using the definition of the projection, we have | Suppose that <math>v=P_{\mathcal C}u.</math> Let <math>w\in\mathcal C</math> and <math>t\in (0,1)</math> be arbitrary. By using the convexity of <math>\mathcal C,</math> it follows that <math>(1-t)v+tw\in\mathcal C.</math> Then, by using the definition of the projection, we have | ||
Line 44: | Line 41: | ||
== Moreau's theorem == | == Moreau's theorem == | ||
- | |||
Moreau's theorem is a fundamental result characterizing projections onto closed convex cones in Hilbert spaces. | Moreau's theorem is a fundamental result characterizing projections onto closed convex cones in Hilbert spaces. | ||
Revision as of 12:39, 17 July 2009
Sándor Zoltán Németh
Contents |
Projection on closed convex sets
Projection mapping
Let be a Hilbert space and
a closed convex set in
The projection mapping
onto
is the mapping
defined by
and
Characterization of the projection
Let be a Hilbert space,
a closed convex set in
and
Then,
if and only if
for all
Proof
Suppose that Let
and
be arbitrary. By using the convexity of
it follows that
Then, by using the definition of the projection, we have
Hence,
By tending with to
we get
Conversely, suppose that for all
Then,
for all Hence, by using the definition of the projection, we get
Moreau's theorem
Moreau's theorem is a fundamental result characterizing projections onto closed convex cones in Hilbert spaces.
Recall that a convex cone in a vector space is a set which is invariant under the addition of vectors and multiplication of vectors by positive scalars.
Theorem (Moreau). Let be a closed convex cone in the Hilbert space
and
its polar cone; that is, the closed convex cone defined by
For the following statements are equivalent:
and
and
Proof of Moreau's theorem
- 1
2: For all
we have
Then, by the characterization of the projection, it follows that
Similarly, for all
we have
- 2
1: By using the characterization of the projection, we have
for all
In particular, if
then
and if
then
Thus,
Denote
Then,
It remains to show that
First, we prove that
For this we have to show that
for all
By using the characterization of the projection, we have
for all
Thus,
We also have
for all
because
By using again the characterization of the projection, it follows that
notes
For definition of convex cone see Convex cone, Wikipedia; in finite dimension see Convex cones, Wikimization.
For definition of polar cone in finite dimension, see more at Dual cone and polar cone.
References
- J. J. Moreau, Décomposition orthogonale d'un espace hilbertien selon deux cones mutuellement polaires, C. R. Acad. Sci., volume 255, pages 238–240, 1962.